Ileana Delia Manea-Săbău Antoanela Curici Lavinia Lucuta Tudor Ciurea Maria Riza Viorel Suciu-Lazar Remus Anton Iuliana Ceausu

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common chromosomal abnormality in the human population, most frequently caused by trisomy 21 due to meiotic nondisjunction. Rarely, DS may result from an isochromosome or a Robertsonian translocation, this being the least common variant. We present a rare prenatal case of Down syndrome caused by a derivative chromosome 21, together with a case-based review of previously reported prenatal der(21;21)/i(21q) rearrangements. We report a case of prenatal diagnosis of DS in a 13-week female fetus, characterized by a derivative chromosome 21, der(21;21)(q10;q10), identified by conventional karyotyping and subsequently confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). First-trimester ultrasonography showed bilateral jugular lymphatic sacs, marked tricuspid regurgitation, and a single umbilical artery. Quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) failed to detect the structural chromosomal abnormality. The rearrangement was considered likely de novo based on normal parental karyotypes. Consequently, the empirical recurrence risk is 1% for de novo cases, whereas in families with a parental 21q;21q rearrangement the recurrence risk may approach 100%. This case highlights the importance of integrating detailed ultrasound screening with molecular and cytogenetic techniques, including QF-PCR, conventional karyotyping, and FISH, for accurate prenatal diagnosis of DS. Precise determination of the underlying chromosomal abnormality is essential for providing accurate genetic counseling, estimating recurrence risk, and facilitating informed reproductive planning for the parents.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Down syndrome, trisomy 21, homologous Robertsonian translocation, der(21;21)(q10;q10), prenatal diagnosis, QF-PCR, genetic counseling, isochromosome

References
1. Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA, et al. National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014. Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1420-1435. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1589. Epub 2019 Oct 3. PMID: 31580536; PMCID: PMC7203968.
2. Weijerman ME, de Winter JP. Clinical practice. The care of children with Down syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Dec;169(12):1445-52. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1253-0. Epub 2010 Jul 15. PMID: 20632187; PMCID: PMC2962780.
3. Kolgeci S, Azemi M, Ahmeti H, et al. Recurrent abortions and down syndrome resulting from Robertsonian translocation 21q; 21q. Med Arch. 2012;66(5):350-2. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.350-352. PMID: 23097978.
4. Vikraman SK, Chandra V, Balakrishanan B, et al. A rare balanced parental t (21q, 21q) Robertsonian translocation that results in Down syndrome in all viable pregnancies | International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015,4(2):514–7. doi: 10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20150451.
5. Kusre G, Sarma M, Nirmolia T, Shankarishan P. Robertsonian translocation T (21; 21) in a female born to normal parents: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jan;9(1):GD01-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10638.5372. Epub 2015 Jan 1. PMID: 25738006; PMCID: PMC4347097.
6. Leung WC, Lao TT. Rapid aneuploidy testing, traditional karyotyping, or both? Lancet. 2005 Jul 9-15;366(9480):97-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66791-8. Erratum in: Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1164. PMID: 16005312.
7. Cao D, Sun J, Li N, et al. Monozygotic twins discordant for homologous Robertsonian translocation trisomy 21 of 46, XX, + 21, der (21;21) (q10; q10) in a twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 30;21(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03587-x. PMID: 33516175; PMCID: PMC7847594.
8. Hervé B, Quibel T, Taieb S, et al. Are de novo rea(21;21) chromosomes really de novo? Clin Case Rep. 2015 Oct;3(10):786-9. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.341. Epub 2015 Aug 26. PMID: 26509006; PMCID: PMC4614639.
9. Carriero, M.L., Graziani, L., Di Tommaso, S. et al. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome 21q homologous rearrangement: integrated cytogenetic and molecular characterization. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 2025; 26:168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-025-00796-3
10. Huijsdens-van Amsterdam K, Page-Christiaens L, Flowers N, et al. Isochromosome 21q is overrepresented among false-negative cell-free DNA prenatal screening results involving Down syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Oct;26(10):1490-1496. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0188-1. Epub 2018 Jun 13. PMID: 29899373; PMCID: PMC6138668.
11. Xu HH, Dai MZ, Wang K, et al. A rare Down syndrome foetus with de novo 21q;21q rearrangements causing false negative results in non-invasive prenatal testing: a case report. BMC Med Genomics. 2020 Jul 6;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12920-020-00751-8. PMID: 32631433; PMCID: PMC7339513.
12. Zhang H, Gao Y, Jiang F, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146,958 pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;45(5):530-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.14792. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Erratum in: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):130. doi: 10.1002/uog.14897. PMID: 25598039.
13. Willems PJ, Dierickx H, Segers N, Castenmiller C, Verschueren S, DeBoulle K, et al. High positive predictive value (PPV) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in a clinical study of 10,000 consecutive pregnancies. J Mol Biomark Diagn. 2016;7(3):285. doi: 10.4172/2155-9929.1000285
14. Oepkes D, Page-Christiaens GC, Bax CJ, et al. Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(12):1083-1090. doi: 10.1002/pd.4945. Epub 2016 Nov 15. PMID: 27750376; PMCID: PMC5214231.
15. Gole L, Lian NB, Lian NP, et al. Prenatal detection of isochromosome 21 by QF-PCR. A comparison between FISH and traditional karyotyping. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24(1):47-50. doi: 10.1159/000132406. Epub 2008 May 27. PMID: 18504381.
16. Chen C, Tang T, Song QL, He YJ, Cai Y. Confusing finding of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction analysis in invasive prenatal genetic diagnosis: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2023 Oct 6;11(28):6895-6901. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6895. PMID: 37901017; PMCID: PMC10600840.
17. Liu JP, Wang SB, Luo L, Guo YM. Improving prenatal diagnosis with combined karyotyping, CNV-seq and QF-PCR: a comprehensive analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in high-risk pregnancies. Front Genet. 2024:15:1517270. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1517270
18. Steinberg C, Zackai EH, Eunpu DL, Mennuti MT, Emanuel BS. Recurrence rate for de novo 21q21q translocation Down syndrome: a study of 112 families. Am J Med Genet. 1984 Feb;17(2):523-30. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320170214. PMID: 6230935.
19. Cederholm M, Sjödén PO, Axelsson O. Psychological distress before and after prenatal invasive karyotyping. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Jun;80(6):539-45. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080006539.x. PMID: 11380290.
How to Cite
Manea-Săbău, I. D., Curici, A. ., Lucuta, L. ., Ciurea, T. ., Riza, M. ., Suciu-Lazar, V. ., Anton, R. ., & Ceausu, I. . (2026). A rare de novo prenatal case of Down syndrome due to der(21;21)(q10;q10). Archive of Clinical Cases, 13(2), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.22551/2026.51.1302.10344
Section
Case-based Reviews

How to Cite

Manea-Săbău, I. D., Curici, A. ., Lucuta, L. ., Ciurea, T. ., Riza, M. ., Suciu-Lazar, V. ., Anton, R. ., & Ceausu, I. . (2026). A rare de novo prenatal case of Down syndrome due to der(21;21)(q10;q10). Archive of Clinical Cases, 13(2), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.22551/2026.51.1302.10344